Install Theme

Your web-browser is very outdated, and as such, this website may not display properly. Please consider upgrading to a modern, faster and more secure browser. Click here to do so.

Sociological Images

Inspiring sociological imaginations everywhere.
Jun 24 '14
$291,978 spent in Philadelphia to make poverty pretty.
By Martin Hart-Landsberg, PhD
We have the money and the know how to tackle most of our social problems.  Certainly unemployment, houselessness, and poverty.  So, why don’t we?
In large part it is because our socially created wealth remains outside social control.  Critical economic decisions are driven by private interests not the public good.  One result is hipster economics.
If you are not familiar with the concept, I recommend Sarah Kendzior’s The Perils of Hipster Economics. Here is the first part:

On May 16, an artist, a railway service and a government agency spent $291,978 to block poverty from the public eye.
Called psychylustro, German artist Katharina Grosse’s project is a large-scale work designed to distract Amtrak train riders from the dilapidated buildings and fallen factories of north Philadelphia. The city has a 28 percent poverty rate – the highest of any major U.S. city – with much of it concentrated in the north. In some north Philadelphia elementary schools, nearly every child is living below the poverty line.
Grosse partnered with the National Endowment of the Arts and Amtrak to mask North Philadelphia’s hardship with a delightful view. The Wall Street Journal calls this “Fighting Urban Blight With Art.” Liz Thomas, the curator of the project, calls it “an experience that asks people to think about this space that they hurtle through every day.”
The project is not actually fighting blight, of course – only the ability of Amtrak customers to see it.
“I need the brilliance of colour to get close to people, to stir up a sense of life experience and heighten their sense of presence,” Grosse proclaims.


“People,” in Grosse and Thomas’s formulation, are not those who actually live in north Philadelphia and bear the brunt of its burdens. “People” are those who can afford to view poverty through the lens of aesthetics as they pass it by.
Urban decay becomes a set piece to be remodeled or romanticised.

The rest of the article is here.
Martin Hart-Landsberg is a professor of economics at Lewis and Clark College. You can follow him at Reports from the Economic Front.

$291,978 spent in Philadelphia to make poverty pretty.

By Martin Hart-Landsberg, PhD

We have the money and the know how to tackle most of our social problems.  Certainly unemployment, houselessness, and poverty.  So, why don’t we?

In large part it is because our socially created wealth remains outside social control.  Critical economic decisions are driven by private interests not the public good.  One result is hipster economics.

If you are not familiar with the concept, I recommend Sarah Kendzior’s The Perils of Hipster Economics. Here is the first part:

On May 16, an artist, a railway service and a government agency spent $291,978 to block poverty from the public eye.

Called psychylustro, German artist Katharina Grosse’s project is a large-scale work designed to distract Amtrak train riders from the dilapidated buildings and fallen factories of north Philadelphia. The city has a 28 percent poverty rate – the highest of any major U.S. city – with much of it concentrated in the north. In some north Philadelphia elementary schools, nearly every child is living below the poverty line.

Grosse partnered with the National Endowment of the Arts and Amtrak to mask North Philadelphia’s hardship with a delightful view. The Wall Street Journal calls this “Fighting Urban Blight With Art.” Liz Thomas, the curator of the project, calls it “an experience that asks people to think about this space that they hurtle through every day.”

The project is not actually fighting blight, of course – only the ability of Amtrak customers to see it.

“I need the brilliance of colour to get close to people, to stir up a sense of life experience and heighten their sense of presence,” Grosse proclaims.

“People,” in Grosse and Thomas’s formulation, are not those who actually live in north Philadelphia and bear the brunt of its burdens. “People” are those who can afford to view poverty through the lens of aesthetics as they pass it by.

Urban decay becomes a set piece to be remodeled or romanticised.

The rest of the article is here.

Martin Hart-Landsberg is a professor of economics at Lewis and Clark College. You can follow him at Reports from the Economic Front.

  1. thehobbit-inyourpants reblogged this from socimages
  2. carnivaloftherandom reblogged this from pluckyyoungdonna
  3. primeval-atom reblogged this from socimages
  4. ars-astronomica reblogged this from socimages
  5. schemingreader reblogged this from socimages and added:
    I called it a Potemkin village, but that’s possibly too flattering. This article provides a good framing of...
  6. jf3141592 reblogged this from socimages
  7. her-mettle reblogged this from socimages
  8. zoilkn reblogged this from socimages
  9. whowantsbongripsandcoffee reblogged this from socimages
  10. rymf reblogged this from socimages
  11. sixohsixoheightfourtwo reblogged this from socimages
  12. v-lagopus reblogged this from knitmeapony
  13. aquilaslocsmith reblogged this from c-has-a-blog
  14. machinegang reblogged this from socimages
  15. danyaabdel reblogged this from socimages
  16. andrew-welker reblogged this from socimages
  17. graciousgourdalmighty reblogged this from socimages
  18. poelitics reblogged this from socimages
  19. lindsewhy reblogged this from socimages
  20. dopeonuhrope reblogged this from socimages and added:
    Hiding poverty tho…
  21. mind-the-wet-paint reblogged this from socimages
  22. floranna2 reblogged this from socimages
  23. docksandmarinas reblogged this from phildeznuts
  24. empiricus-sextusempiricus reblogged this from new-topographics